US Expedites Anti-Dumping Reviews
13/07/2017 12:00
The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has voted to expedite reviews of anti-dumping duty (AD) orders to determine whether certain US producers would continue to suffer harm in their absence.
USITC has voted not to hold a full review concerning AD orders on fresh garlic from China, certain stilbenic optical brightening agents from China and Taiwan, and certain steel nails from the United Arab Emirates. This means that USITC will determine whether to maintain AD orders on the basis of the facts already available, including the prior injury and review determinations. It will not hold a hearing or conduct further investigations.
Under the Uruguay Round Agreement, AD orders must be reviewed at least every five years. USITC will usually maintain AD orders whenever revocation is likely to lead to material injury of the US domestic industry "within a reasonably foreseeable time."
USITC determines whether a full review is required based on the level of interest it receives after issuing notice of a review. In all three of these cases, USITC determined that responses from domestic industry was "adequate," whilst those from the respondents subject to the AD orders were "inadequate".
USITC has voted not to hold a full review concerning AD orders on fresh garlic from China, certain stilbenic optical brightening agents from China and Taiwan, and certain steel nails from the United Arab Emirates. This means that USITC will determine whether to maintain AD orders on the basis of the facts already available, including the prior injury and review determinations. It will not hold a hearing or conduct further investigations.
Under the Uruguay Round Agreement, AD orders must be reviewed at least every five years. USITC will usually maintain AD orders whenever revocation is likely to lead to material injury of the US domestic industry "within a reasonably foreseeable time."
USITC determines whether a full review is required based on the level of interest it receives after issuing notice of a review. In all three of these cases, USITC determined that responses from domestic industry was "adequate," whilst those from the respondents subject to the AD orders were "inadequate".
Source: Tax-news
Các tin khác
- New-generation FTAs open wider export opportunities to Middle East and South Asia (15/06/2026)
- Updated regulations on foreign trade management and import quotas (15/06/2026)
- Mandatory traceability for high-risk goods from July 1st: What should businesses prepare for? (15/06/2026)
- Tariff pressure is forcing businesses to restructure in order to adapt. (15/06/2026)
- Coffee Citizens model aims to lift Vietnamese value chain (15/06/2026)
About Us
