Nature of Section 301

08/12/2022 05:30 - 83 Views

Fundamentally, Section 301 proceedings involve political pressure and policy objectives more than law and facts. United States companies pursue Section 301 cases when they want the United States Government through the use of threatened sanctions - to help the company or industry achieve some objective in relation to foreign rivals. Not surprisingly, foreign countries have balked at this approach. Section 301 has therefore emerged as one of the most controversial and politically sensitive weapons in the arsenal of United States trade remedies.

 

The intensely political nature of what is commonly referred to as Section 301 emerged over time. Congress initially enacted it as part of the 1974 Trade Act. Originally intended to provide United States industries with a mechanism to enforce United States rights under international agreements, over the years Section 301 has been transformed by Congress from a narrow legal tool for raising issues under international agreements into a much broader policy weapon for United States industry to wield. Congress has expanded the reasons for invoking Section 301 and has intensified the political pressure on the Administration to act.

 

Some perceive Section 301 as being targeted at developed countries and areas such as the EU and Japan. Although there certainly have been Section 301 cases against developed countries, there have also been numerous cases against developing countries. These cases have involved a wide range of United States complaints against its trading partners.

 

As table 1 shows, a wide range of countries and a wide variety of practices have been challenged under Section 301.

 

Table 1. Developing country Section 301 cases since 1974, in chronological order

 

Country

Product/issue

Allegation

Guatemala

Cargo preference

Discriminatory shipping practice

China

Major home appliances

Confiscatory tariff levels

Brazil, Republic of Korea and China

Thrown silk

Preventing entry of imports

Argentina

Marine insurance

Requirement that marine insurance be placed with

Republic of Korea

Insurance Hides

Argentine firm

Argentina

Non-rubber footwear

Failure to issue a licence

Brazil

Steel wire rope

Export controls on hides Import restrictions

Republic of Korea

Soybean oil and meal

Subsidization of export of Korean steel wire rope

Brazil

Rice

Export and production subsidies and quantitative restrictions

Taiwan Province (China)

Air couriers

Subsidization of exports

Argentina

Films

Exclusive control over the alr transportation of commercial documents

Taiwan Province (China)

Informatics

Discrimination against foreign film distributors

Brazil

Insurance

Investment restrictions, subsidies, and import restrictions

Republic of Korea

Intellectual property rights

Restriction of the ability of United States insurers to provide insurance services

Republic of Korea

Soybeans and soybean

Lack of effective protection

Argentina

products

Differential in export taxes

Taiwan Province (China)

Customs valuation

Duty paying system to calculate customs duties

Taiwan Province (China)

Beer, wine and tobacco

Policies and practices regarding distribution

India

Almonds

Licensing requirements and steep tariffs

Brazil

Pharmaceuticals

Lack of process and patent protection

Republic of Korea

Cigarettes

Unreasonable denial of access

Republic of Korea

Beef

Restrictive licensing system on imports of all bovine meat

Republic of Korea

Wine

Unreasonable denial of access

Argentina

Pharmaceuticals

Denial of product patent protection

Brazil

Import licensing

Certain import restrictions

India

Investment

Trade-restricting measures on foreign investors

India

Insurance

Barriers to foreign insurance providers

Thailand

Copyright enforcement

Inadequate enforcement

Thailand

Pharmaceuticals

Denial of adequate and effective patent protection

India

Intellectual property protection

Dental of adequate and effective protection

China

Intellectual property protection

Denial of adequate and effective protection, equitable market access

Indonesia

Pencil slats

Enhancement of export to third-country markets

Brazil

Intellectual property rights

Denial of adequate and effective protection

Republic of Korea

Agricultural market access restrictions

Practices regarding importation

Colombia

Bananas

Practices regarding exportation of bananas

Pakistan

Pharmaceutical and agricultural chemicals

Denial of patents, and exclusive marketing rights

Turkey

Tax on box office revenues

Discriminatory treatment of United States films

India

Pharmaceuticals and agricultural chemicals

Denial of patents and exclusive marketing rights

Argentina

Apparel, textiles, footwear

Specific duties, statistical tax and labelling requirement

Indonesia

Promotion of motor vehicle sector

Grant of conditional tax and tariff benefits

Brazil

Trade and investment in auto sector

Export performance and domestic content requirements

Republic of Korea

Auto imports

Barriers to imports

Honduras

Intellectual property rights

Inadequate protection

Paraguay

Intellectual property laws and practices

Denial of adequate and effective protection

Mexico

High fructose corn syrup

Agreement between Merican sugar growers and bottlers

 

Source: Business Guide to Trade Remedies in the United States: Anti-dumping, countervailing and safeguards legislation practices and procedures

Quảng cáo sản phẩm