Home
About Us
Injury determinations
08/12/2022 04:20
The United States International Trade Commission (the Commission) determines whether a United States industry is suffering material injury (or is threatened with material injury) 'by reason of the targeted imports. Under United States law, the Commission must make an affirmative injury determination before anti-dumping or countervailing duties can be imposed. Consequently, because it is so rare for the Commerce Department not to find dumping margins, in the United States system most often it is the Commission's injury investigation that decides whether anti-dumping duties are actually imposed. A negative injury determination by the Commission terminates the anti-dumping or countervailing duty investigation.
Past practice indicates that the likelihood of success at the Commission is greater than the likelihood of success at the Commerce Department. Indeed, in about 15% of preliminary investigations and about 30%-40% of final investigations, the Commission makes negative determinations. These success rates compare quite favourably to the very rare case in which the Commerce Department does not find dumping margins.
Although very important, Commission injury determinations are much less predictable than Commerce Department anti-dumping margin calculations. The Commission must make the difficult qualitative judgement of whether the domestic industry is suffering material injury. Even more difficult is the qualitative and somewhat subjective determination of whether the injury is caused by the imported merchandise, or by some other factor. Because of these inherently subjective judgements, it is extremely difficult to predict the outcome of a Commission injury analysis. The outcome is also difficult to predict because new Commissioners are appointed and bring new perspectives to this subjective process.
It is important for foreign companies to understand the process and the key issues involved in injury investigations. The company staff members need to explain to senior management what is happening during the anti-dumping investigation. They also need to supply information to the lawyers as part defence. Most importantly, however, foreign companies can sometimes adjust their behaviour in the marketplace to reduce the risk of an affirmative finding of injury. If a company is sensitive to the issues involved in an injury investigation, it has a much better chance of adjusting its behaviour.
This chapter provides an overview of the issues that arise in injury investigations. Chapter 2 has already described the procedural framework of the Commission's preliminary and final determinations. This chapter reviews the four substantive questions that the Commission must answer in each injury investigation:
- Which products produced in the United States are 'like' the imported products subject to investigation?
- Which companies make up the domestic industry producing the like products?
- Is this particular domestic industry 'materially' injured?
- Did imports 'cause' the injury being suffered by this industry?
This chapter briefly explains the Commission's conceptual framework for answering each of the questions. Note that these issues are basically the same in both anti-dumping and countervailing duty investigations. Chapters 14 and 15 then go into more detail on how the Commission conducts its preliminary and final injury investigations.
